Forerunner 301 vs 305
I am so jonesing for a GPS/HRM combo so I don't look like a robot when I go out running. The difference in price between the 2 models available is about $100. Is it worth it?
I have teeny writsts so the shape of the 301 is fine with me. What I need to know is if you think the signal is better and is the 305 waterproof enough that you can wear it while swimming in open water.
If you have any ideas please let me know. I've read a few reviews but it still isn't clear to me.
Comments
DATE: November 13, 2006 3:15 PM
I am not quite sure how I arrived at your blog but I am very impressed with your running and working out. We are the same age and for the first time in my life, I am overweight. Would you mind sharing how you first started running? I realize you may not have the time to respond to such a broad question but thanks anyways for inspiring me!
Posted by: Karen h | January 27, 2007 6:43 PM
DATE: November 13, 2006 3:38 PM
I've read that the 305 isn't as waterproof as the 301 that is why I am considering the 301. For more review on the 305: http://www.amazon.com/Garmin-Forerunner-Wrist-Mounted-Personal-Training/dp/B000CSWCQA/sr=8-1/qid=1163460507/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/102-8302471-0392960?ie=UTF8&s=electronics. Reviews on the 301: http://www.amazon.com/Garmin-Forerunner-Personal-Heart-Monitor/dp/B00077U4RU/sr=8-6/qid=1163460507/ref=pd_bbs_6/102-8302471-0392960?ie=UTF8&s=electronics
Posted by: bluetri | January 27, 2007 6:43 PM
DATE: November 13, 2006 8:59 PM
The 301 is waterproof to a certain extent. I used to put it in a baggy and then up in my swim cap so that it could "see" when my head was down in the water. The 205 and 305 don't share this waterproof quality - as I understand, but they are far more comfortable for us small wristed folks.
Posted by: Juls | January 27, 2007 6:43 PM
DATE: November 13, 2006 10:56 PM
I was told by the local running store that the 201 is a steal now, which I might go for. :D
Posted by: Firefly's RunningJanuary 27, 2007 6:43 PM
DATE: November 14, 2006 7:34 PM
I can only speak for the 305 which I own. It is great, no problems and I have run in the rain with it many times, no swimming but the rain has not been an issue. I have had great success with getting and holding GPS signal. I have never had any wacky HR readings. Althought it helps to moisten the chest strap before you start. The difference between the 301 and 305 from what I have read is that the 305 has a much better chip and holds signal much better in difficult conditions. Trees, building and similar areas. I can't say that I have ever lost signal except in the Chicago Marathon when we ran under a 1/4 mile overpass. The 305 also from what I understand has a much better HR monitor and link as the 301 can get wacked out at times. At least that is what I have read on cool running about it.I find the 305 to be an indensible tool, I love love love it and recommend you spend the extra green and go with the new model. JMHO Good luck
Posted by: Bob | January 27, 2007 6:43 PM
DATE: November 14, 2006 7:35 PM
oh and one trick, if you get one, to get signal set it on something flat and turn it on and let it aquire signal. Then put it on your wrist it aquires faster and is more accurate.
Posted by: Bob | January 27, 2007 6:43 PM
DATE: November 15, 2006 5:26 AM
I want a 305 with all my heart . . . it will be a while before I get one.
Posted by: Susan | January 27, 2007 6:43 PM
DATE: November 15, 2006 10:31 AM
Karen H - you have given me an idea for a new post. I will write about my running history soon.
Posted by: 21st Century Mom | January 27, 2007 6:43 PM
DATE: November 15, 2006 2:07 PM
Thanks so much! I keep coming back to your blog to see if you have responded. And thanks again for inspriring me!
Posted by: Karen H | January 27, 2007 6:43 PM
DATE: November 16, 2006 9:06 PM
I have the 205 - used to have the 201 but switched when it broke. I definitely feel that it has an easier time obtaining and holding the satellite signal. My usual park trail is wooded and the 201 totally lost the signal frequently. The 205 rarely loses the signal, and when it does it searches for a longer time, if that makes sense. The 201 used to just give up and go blank.Just my experience, hope it helps.
Posted by: DebbieJRT | January 27, 2007 6:43 PM
DATE: November 17, 2006 8:06 AM
i have the 301 and have stopped using it because i was getting those wacky hr readings. i'm wondering if its the shape of the strap for women, maybe? i wear a polar (with the soft strap) now and i like it much better although it doesn't give all the info that the garmin does. i found, though, that i pretty much always run in the same place, i didn't really need all the functionality of the garmin, i really only needed the hr monitoring. they are cool, though.
Posted by: momo | January 27, 2007 6:43 PM
DATE: November 18, 2006 2:56 AM
Garmin is my nightmare, I have a 201 and it never measures the same distance! A friend of mine got the 305 and he says that it works very well. The 305 will be my wife's next present.
Posted by: Black Knight | January 27, 2007 6:43 PM
DATE: November 18, 2006 8:02 PM
I have the 205 and I love it, love it, love it. I kinda wish I would ahve splurged and gotten the 305 with heart monitor though. I have no trouble with proper mile measurement. It takes a little while though to link to the satelites. But I live in the city!
Posted by: Running Rabbit | January 27, 2007 6:43 PM
DATE: November 19, 2006 5:20 AM
This post has been removed by a blog administrator.
Posted by: Anonymous | January 27, 2007 6:43 PM
DATE: November 20, 2006 11:41 AM
For the GPS and fit aspect, here's a very detailed review of 201 vs 205. (Neither has the HRM)http://mobileanalystwatch.blogspot.com/2006/02/first-look-garmin-forerunner-205.htmlThis guy put a good bit of time into the review. Enjoy!
Posted by: Steve J | January 27, 2007 6:43 PM